
Lang: No comment on behalf of the whole class is a mirror – Lang, approval, speech – HC Network Appliance Industry
Human Rights year high last comprehensive statewide debate on reform Lang noted the "Hong Kong businessmen's rights" banners. This year, in March, the two media in Hong Kong, Lang rounded to 10,000 words in the book describes the proposal of the deputies of business interests in Hong Kong? On the establishment of Hong Kong's rights and interests the people of the proposed investment of the Fund. But then triggered a question: Lang at the end who speaks in? Lang replied: "I'm not in the approval of a particular class, my only purpose is to call an impartial, systematic rule of environmental law. "
The Last year Mr. Lang asked the state-owned enterprises when the MBO, the country has attracted a question in the final Lang speaks for what interests? Even the domestic economy holds together for the same purpose? Xianping view. This debate had dispersed the smoke, I have no intention discussions on this area in the past to discuss right and wrong. However, to take today, Lang, "Hong Kong businessmen rights" of the flag, the same issue came out, and Lang at the end speaks for whom?
Perhaps we can only Lang cites examples of violations of the rights and interests of entrepreneurs in Hong Kong has concluded: Lang is one of those rights have been violated businessmen say. However, it seems a paradox that we can not say that a consumer association for consumer protection rights is the same for the consumer to tell the truth. Lang is not the Consumers' Association of Hong Kong entrepreneurs are business customers, simply because the crime of violation of consumer rights, or infringes the rights of entrepreneurs from Hong Kong, injury law, undermine social equity. The consumer association or function is that this phenomenon Lang, recovery this injustice, and nothing else.
As Lang says, I am not in approval of some sort. Am absolutely convinced that one of the interests of a particular class, or approval of economists, is not sufficient to generate social credibility. Maybe we can judge a thing to the person right and wrong is wrong, but I think as a general public all have the ability to exercise common sense.
But for approval Lang of the question gives me a great interest to economists in a class should talk to her? For economists who speak in the end? I think my state of the art surface, is clearly insufficient to give an official response to these questions, but as a feeling ordinary common sense, I feel the need to express their true thoughts.
We note that when the new economic policies adopted, are always those we know with a first class economic policy that would benefit. Unfortunately, the dispute over these questions is not only based on the principle of academic challenges, but many will join the class. For example, once a highly controversial in view community: we are poor because they are rich. This economic bloc to the strong differentiation occurs, some economists seem to be a mouthpiece for the rich.
If the point of view, I hope to have an economist who really understand the people's voice can speak for the interests of vulnerable groups, but the rich and powerful groups are obviously resources to get more votes. Therefore, only the owner can expect good words, economists can only stand in the position to succumb to the authority and interest in promoting social equity, social progress and talking. This should not only look forward to good, but should reflect the academic consciousness.
I think this sense, Lang does not speak for all classes "has become a mirror. For example, Mr. Lang said that" the laws of the mainland that the sound can base, now the largest and most important problem arises in the implementation of alienation. "We should consider this issue in a rational and repair solution.
By contrast, when Lang was raised at the end of the matter for which the question is approved and a certain class features become the voice of a particular class. This deserves our vigilance? When the voice fell to a few particular areas of voice, the range of social justice and legal developments, removed.
You may not need a lawyer, we really need to hear the voice of a teacher who sent the spokesman of equity and justice, perhaps the only way we can in a more harmonious society About the Author
I am a professional editor from
China Product
, and my work is to promote a free online trade platform.
http://www.himfr.com/ contain a great deal of information about
commercial dishwashers
,
beer taps
welcome to visit!
Free Beer Banner
[affmage source="ebay" results="10"]Beer Banner[/affmage]